What does it indicate when a conclusion is characterized as "unsupported"?

What does it indicate when a conclusion is characterized as "unsupported"?

• A. It is based on strong evidence and reasoning
• B. There is sufficient evidence or reasoning to validate it
• C. There is insufficient evidence or reasoning to back it
• D. It is universally accepted and agreed upon

Answer: (C)

When a conclusion is characterized as "unsupported," it indicates that there is insufficient evidence or reasoning to back it. This means that the argument fails to adequately justify the conclusion with relevant facts, data, or logical reasoning. In this context, an unsupported conclusion cannot be confidently accepted because the foundation upon which it is built is weak or nonexistent. Strong conclusions require a solid base of evidence; thus, when one is labeled as unsupported, it underscores a gap in the argument's validity or reliability.

When a conclusion is characterized as "unsupported," it indicates that there is insufficient evidence or reasoning to back it. This means that the argument fails to adequately justify the conclusion with relevant facts, data, or logical reasoning. In this context, an unsupported conclusion cannot be confidently accepted because the foundation upon which it is built is weak or nonexistent. Strong conclusions require a solid base of evidence; thus, when one is labeled as unsupported, it underscores a gap in the argument's validity or reliability.